Among the lowest growth rates this week were the team of Gemma and Adam (8.57mm/d) and Natalie (also 8.57mm/d). Saddest of all, however, was Shaun, who actually managed a negative growth rate (-1.43 mm/d), probably owing to the amputation of the dead and gangrenous section at the top of his plant.
Interestingly, growth rate shows a strong linear relationship with size:
A special mention goes out to Nick, whose plant showed the highest growth rate for its size (i.e. showed the largest positive residual… this contest is being run by a bunch of nerdy scientists, remember). At the other extreme is Sunny, whose plant showed the lowest growth rate for its size (other than a certain plant that was surgically altered). Time to step up the watering, Sunny!
Also, we've received a pic of the sole entry from the vet school from Matt. It looks as though he's the first to utilize the "anchor to a wall with rope" technique. Lookin' good!:
Here are the scores as of June 22, 2011. Special shout-out to Winnie Boner and Nick Beevers for help with the measurements this week, and Donald Reid and Ashley LeVin Last week. The plants are getting so big now that measuring is a 3 person job!:
Adam/Gemma | 700 |
Amy/Lyndsey | 1230 |
Caroline | 940 |
Donald | 1120 |
Eilidh/Louis | 1470 |
Eliza/Vic | 1100 |
Emma/Leoni | 800 |
Florence/Roger | 1370 |
George/Karen | 0 |
Iain/Rob/Liam | 1440 |
Justyna | 910 |
Lesley | 930 |
Matt | 970 |
Natalie | 520 |
Nick | 1090 |
Rob | 1030 |
Roman | 990 |
Shaun | 590 |
Sunny | 1040 |
Willie | 930 |
Zara | 1050 |
That is a nice post. The interesting thing is how you did graphical comparison of the growth rate of the plants. I hope that my plants also do well this season.
ReplyDelete